If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Football Forums > Worldwide Football Forums > Uefa Champions League & Europa League
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Arcade Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 20th June 2010, 19:00   #21
Tonybhoy cfc
Anti Establishment
 
Tonybhoy cfc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 3,961
Location: Glasgow
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bergkamp95-06 View Post
Top 16 in order just because you mentioned it. Last season

Ukraine
England
Spain
Germany
Italy
France
Russia
Denmark
Turkey
Portugal
Greece
Cyprus
Holland
Poland
Slovakia
Belgium

This year.

Germany
England (Fulham are Englands highest point scorers last year with 26.0)
Spain
Italy
France
Portugal
Netherlands
Austria
Belgium
Greece
Turkey
Isreal
Russia
Romainia
Ukraine
Switzerland

Edit - The country coeffients are worked out from just the previous season. Not the previous 5.
Well everyone of those countries should have their Champions straight in and Celtic and the rest have to play qualifiers i have no problem with that it makes it a more fair competition rather than having a team finishing third in their league going straight in.
__________________
Tonybhoy cfc is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 20th June 2010, 19:05   #22
CelticBhoy1990
Banned
 
CelticBhoy1990's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 3,301
Quote:
Originally Posted by baggy View Post
The main reason there is so much money in the CL is because all the big teams are playing together.You replace that and make it all champions only and the Money involved will dramatically decrease.
exactly your spot on and thats why uefa do their best to ensure the majority of big name clubs make it into it every year.

but is that really fair? probably not because it doesn't give the smaller countries much of a chance of improvement, or even getting their name on the european map.

but that's the way it is, that's life.
CelticBhoy1990 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20th June 2010, 23:51   #23
BigBlueMachine
I am establishment
 
BigBlueMachine's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 7,088
Location: Establishmentland.
Im not complaining this season, we are in automatically despite being awful in it last season
__________________
BigBlueMachine is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21st June 2010, 20:23   #24
DeadlyDemon
THFC is my religion
 
DeadlyDemon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 10,537
Location: Peterborough
Still don't agree with seeded/non seeded. Happy enough with that though, as I've said previously Celtic are probably the only side I'd want to avoid.

Saying that I'd have loved Ajax at the Lane
__________________
Last game I went to:
Tottenham 0-1 Wigan (28th Aug)
Next game I'm going to:
Tottenham v
DeadlyDemon is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 22nd June 2010, 23:19   #25
TOM OAFC
Registered User
 
TOM OAFC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 18,658
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tonybhoy cfc View Post
I know celtic have been shit last couple of years but Braga are there not due to the Club but due to the league and tbh the full process even Celtic aside annoys me, why should England get three places straight in, its is a complete joke imo, since it is the CL only Champions should go straight in everyone else plays qualifiers with no seeds imo.
How the hell can you have ago at there league. The league in Portugal is by far more competitive and harder to win than the Scottish league which is a dull 2 horse race. The fact you got Sporting, Benfica and Porto, plus Boavista think you should eat your own words.
__________________
Having a beer at the footie become a fan

http://www.facebook.com/editalbum.ph...e/308758163704
TOM OAFC is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23rd June 2010, 00:05   #26
Tonybhoy cfc
Anti Establishment
 
Tonybhoy cfc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 3,961
Location: Glasgow
Quote:
Originally Posted by TOM OAFC View Post
How the hell can you have ago at there league. The league in Portugal is by far more competitive and harder to win than the Scottish league which is a dull 2 horse race. The fact you got Sporting, Benfica and Porto, plus Boavista think you should eat your own words.
Am not having a go at their league unlike some posters i don't base what i think of a team on the league they play in, the qualifying process is completely unfair and cuts off all competition from across the board.

So don't accuse me of Bringing down another league when that is BS i have said that i don't feel someone like Braga deserves to be seeded ahead of Celtic (nothing against Braga in the slightest just my view on things) and i also think it is rubbish that a team that can finish third in their domestic league can get straight entry in to the CHAMPIONS league ahead of teams who are actually CHAMPIONS of their domestic league.

And i await the usual but that's in a harder league etc it is still not the point and makes a complete joke of the competition, i would rather see the Champions of Malta and Sweden go straight into the CHAMPIONS league because they are CHAMPIONS, the competition is the most biased in the world of sport and that is why i don't like it.

Edit: Aye a dull two horse race what has La Liga and the prem been for the last few years then.
__________________
Tonybhoy cfc is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 23rd June 2010, 00:25   #27
TOM OAFC
Registered User
 
TOM OAFC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 18,658
Ok i thought you where taking a dig although i do argree with alot of your points and yeah Celtic may have more experince in Europe but i still feel how a team finishes there season on merit achieves more than past European competitons unless you win it or the main group stage draw itself.

I agree with what your saying about the 3rd and 4th place sides they should be made to qualify from the earliest rounds possible. I think if Scotland had a 3rd champs league spot, the standard would improve teams would play better games and that extra revenue would allow them to keep there better players out the clutches of the old firm.
__________________
Having a beer at the footie become a fan

http://www.facebook.com/editalbum.ph...e/308758163704
TOM OAFC is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23rd June 2010, 00:31   #28
Tonybhoy cfc
Anti Establishment
 
Tonybhoy cfc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 3,961
Location: Glasgow
Quote:
Originally Posted by TOM OAFC View Post
Ok i thought you where taking a dig although i do argree with alot of your points and yeah Celtic may have more experince in Europe but i still feel how a team finishes there season on merit achieves more than past European competitons unless you win it or the main group stage draw itself.

I agree with what your saying about the 3rd and 4th place sides they should be made to qualify from the earliest rounds possible. I think if Scotland had a 3rd champs league spot, the standard would improve teams would play better games and that extra revenue would allow them to keep there better players out the clutches of the old firm.
Exactly i just want to see a fair competition for all and not teams getting an easy route just due to the league they play in.
__________________
Tonybhoy cfc is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 23rd June 2010, 15:59   #29
CelticBhoy1990
Banned
 
CelticBhoy1990's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 3,301
Quote:
Originally Posted by TOM OAFC View Post
How the hell can you have ago at there league. The league in Portugal is by far more competitive and harder to win than the Scottish league which is a dull 2 horse race. The fact you got Sporting, Benfica and Porto, plus Boavista think you should eat your own words.
Boavista are in the 2nd division

Plus their league is a 2 horse race also

Most years between Porto and Benfica

Sporting Braga appeared from knowhere to finish 2nd last year and Sporting 4th.

But there are 2 main teams in that league also because sporting lisbon don't challenge often enough
CelticBhoy1990 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14th July 2010, 11:25   #30
HUNT IS GOD
Registered User
 
HUNT IS GOD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 456
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dutch Don View Post
Can't agree more tbh, although it would be even beter to only allow champions in the CL.
or rename it champions and rich also rans league
__________________
red black red black red black army
HUNT IS GOD is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18th July 2010, 17:19   #31
the c-man
LEST WE FORGET
 
the c-man's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 1,286
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tonybhoy cfc View Post
And i await the usual but that's in a harder league etc it is still not the point and makes a complete joke of the competition, i would rather see the Champions of Malta and Sweden go straight into the CHAMPIONS league because they are CHAMPIONS, the competition is the most biased in the world of sport and that is why i don't like it.
You don't like the CL? Away and don't talk shite.

Anyway, don't you know that Qualifying for the CL has been changed in the last couple of years to allow more Champions to Qualify?

That's why there is a Champions path and a Non-Champions path. The sides who finished 2nd/3rd/4th in the domestic league compete against each other for 5 places, and the Champions of the lesser countries qualify against each other for the other 5. So you can hardly say its biased.

You wouldn't be flapping your gums if your heroes in green and grey hoops had qualified automaticly.
the c-man is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18th July 2010, 17:48   #32
Tonybhoy cfc
Anti Establishment
 
Tonybhoy cfc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 3,961
Location: Glasgow
Quote:
Originally Posted by the c-man View Post
You don't like the CL? Away and don't talk shite.

Anyway, don't you know that Qualifying for the CL has been changed in the last couple of years to allow more Champions to Qualify?

That's why there is a Champions path and a Non-Champions path. The sides who finished 2nd/3rd/4th in the domestic league compete against each other for 5 places, and the Champions of the lesser countries qualify against each other for the other 5. So you can hardly say its biased.

You wouldn't be flapping your gums if your heroes in green and grey hoops had qualified automaticly.
Yes they have gave a few more nations rightfully a better chance to qualify.

But when a team that finishes 4th in their division are seeded above the CHAMPIONS from a domestic league then the competition is biased and only geared towards making the rich richer, yes i would like Celtic to be in it due to the financial implications it will have for the club but that does not mean i have to respect the competition because i do not and until i see even more changes to it then i will continue not to respect the competition.

No country should get more than two entrants imo.
And i will flap my gums all i like so get back in your cage.
__________________
Tonybhoy cfc is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 18th July 2010, 18:52   #33
the c-man
LEST WE FORGET
 
the c-man's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 1,286
You keep highlighting the word Champions then go onto say that no country should get more than 2 teams... bit of a contadiction there

Personally I would like it if it was a tournament only for Champions, straight knockout..... but its not gonna happen.

So while the format stays as it is, I would rather watch Arsenal v Real Madrid (Two Non-Champs) than some gang from Moldova playing a bunch of fisherman from the Faroes.

Anyway, in a couple of weeks your not going to have to worry about the CL
the c-man is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20th July 2010, 22:26   #34
Godders9
Registered User
 
Godders9's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 219
Location: Bicester, Oxon
Absolutely delighted to see Sampdoria qualify for the UCL last season after a fantastic season in Serie A. Praying that Samp can avoid Spurs in the qualifying rounds and if Pazzini, Palombo and Cassano stay it should be possible - I'd even fancy Samp to beat Spurs over two legs if they're fit.

It would be a huge shame to get in to the UCL and then not make the group stages. In fact, it'd piss me right off
__________________
- Godders

My blog: http://footballcoaching.wordpress.com (Latest Post: Repetition pays off, team pass it like Arsenal!)
Godders9 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29th July 2010, 12:54   #35
luke80
Swindon Town away games!
 
luke80's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 1,718
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tonybhoy cfc View Post
Sporting Braga seeded ahead of celtic shows exactly what is wrong with this competitions qualifying process.


PS: I'm sorry Tony - I know it's not over yet, but it had to be done.
__________________
Opinionated and uniformed, but patriotic and proud of it!

Last edited by luke80 : 29th July 2010 at 12:57.
luke80 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29th July 2010, 13:17   #36
Tonybhoy cfc
Anti Establishment
 
Tonybhoy cfc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 3,961
Location: Glasgow
Quote:
Originally Posted by luke80 View Post


PS: I'm sorry Tony - I know it's not over yet, but it had to be done.
And i stand by with what i said. Braga were the best out of two bad teams last night.
__________________
Tonybhoy cfc is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 30th July 2010, 01:15   #37
NavanDrog
I Control The Insects.
 
NavanDrog's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 3,660
Location: An Uaimh
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tonybhoy cfc View Post
And i stand by with what i said. Braga were the best out of two bad teams last night.
Best by a long way. Scottish football is only slightly ahead of Irish football now, and theyve both gone backwards over the past year.
__________________
NavanDrog is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3rd August 2010, 03:05   #38
RiccardoPiccio
Registered User
 
RiccardoPiccio's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 3,158
Location: Back Home
Going to try and estimate what the pots will look like when the Champions League is drawn, even though we are a few rounds away from the group stage draw yet.

Out of the current teams i would say

Pot 1 - Barcelona, Manchester United, Chelsea, Arsenal, Bayern Munich, Lyon, AC Milan and Inter
Pot 2 - Real Madrid, AS Roma, Benfica, Valencia, Shakhtar, Marseille
Pot 3 - Rangers, Panathinikos, Schalke, Rubin Kazan, Spartak Moscow
Pot 4 - Bursaspor, CFR Cluj, Twente

Now if we throw in the potential qualifiers for the tournament, their rankings could be the following if they make it through the qualification.

Tottenham - Pot 2/3
Zenit - Pot 3
Sevilla - Pot 2
Werder Bremen - Pot 2
Sampdoria - Pot 3
Ajax - Pot 3
Auxerre - Pot 4
Braga - Pot 4
Dynamo Kiev - Pot 4
Unirea Urziceni - Pot 4
Celtic - Pot 3/4
Fenerbache - Pot 3
__________________
Back in the UK

Last edited by RiccardoPiccio : 3rd August 2010 at 03:12.
RiccardoPiccio is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 3rd August 2010, 08:51   #39
RD4L
VIVA EL CHICHARITO!
 
RD4L's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 4,401
Location: Behind you
Why would Lyon be in pot 1 when they did not even win the title in their domestic league last season?
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sir Alex Ferguson
"No matter how many people criticise him [Berbatov], it never comes from inside our camp. We see that class. We know we've got the right player."
RD4L is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3rd August 2010, 09:08   #40
zippy
Hard but fair !
 
zippy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 17,364
Location: Block 115 - Südkurve
Quote:
Originally Posted by RiccardoPiccio View Post
Pot 1 - Barcelona, Manchester United, Chelsea, Arsenal, Bayern Munich, Lyon, AC Milan and Inter
Quote:
Originally Posted by RD4L View Post
Why would Lyon be in pot 1 when they did not even win the title in their domestic league last season?
Neither did you or the other two highlighted teams for that matter, but you are fairly certain to be in the top group.
__________________
zippy is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

All times are GMT +1. The time now is 19:28.